[tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.

[Jason Merrill]

On 24 May 2003 00:07:04 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 23:55, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
>> Removing the STRIP_NOPS we have now at the start of is_simple_unary_expr
>> would make things work again (at the expense of forcing the gimplifier
>> to create a new temporary).
>> 
>> This is a change in the GIMPLE grammar.  Do we want to change it?  This
>> means making CALL_EXPR detection a bit more cumbersome.
>> 
> I meant that having the STRIP_NOPS at the start of is_simple_unary_expr
> is a change in the GIMPLE grammar.  Sorry.

Right.  Unless we want to allow NOPs everywhere, and I don't think we do,
the STRIP_NOPS must go.

Jason