[tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.

[Jason Merrill]

On 23 May 2003 23:55:33 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:

> Right now is_simple_unary_expr is causing us to accept this as a gimple
> statement:
>
> p = (char *)malloc(100);

Well, that's wrong.

> Removing the STRIP_NOPS we have now at the start of is_simple_unary_expr
> would make things work again (at the expense of forcing the gimplifier
> to create a new temporary).

Sounds right to me.

Jason