[tree-ssa] tree-ssa vs. fold
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Sun Jun 8 06:10:00 GMT 2003
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 09:00:02PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> I don't think that's right. You could have an object whose size depends on
> a non-volatile variable and then modify the variable before one use of
> the size. The SAVE_EXPR forces proper evaluation in that case.
Hum, perhaps. However, it does seem like we ought be
be able to do *something* in the extremely common case of
a plain "int" variable.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list