[tree-ssa] tree-ssa vs. fold

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Sun Jun 8 06:10:00 GMT 2003


On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 09:00:02PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> I don't think that's right.  You could have an object whose size depends on
> a non-volatile variable and then modify the variable before one use of
> the size.  The SAVE_EXPR forces proper evaluation in that case.

Hum, perhaps.  However, it does seem like we ought be
be able to do *something* in the extremely common case of
a plain "int" variable.


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list