[tree-ssa] Maintaining g95

[S. Bosscher]

The idea was that g95 should be gfor as in Gnu FORtran.  But the name change
never happened.  We'll look at this before the merge.

Gr.
Steven



-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Elliston
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Sent: 15-7-03 15:12
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95

Paul Brook <paul@nowt.org> writes:

> We thing we're now ready for inclusion. Nothing special needs to be
> done: just drop in the g95 and libgfor directories, and a small
> patch to teach toplevel configure about libgfor.

libgfor seems like an award name -- it's not clear what "for" stands
for. [:-)] Is it the G95 runtime?  If so, how about libg95?

Ben