RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437)

[Nathanael Nerode]

This is just a proof of concept.  In particular, the mangling chosen
was arbitrary and probably wrong.  :-)

But I'd like a C++ person to look at bug 11437, and at my analysis and 
see what should be done.  An alternative solution is to remove _Complex 
support from C++, of course.

Index: operators.def
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/operators.def,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.14 operators.def
--- operators.def	3 Apr 2003 15:42:16 -0000	1.14
+++ operators.def	9 Jul 2003 22:00:13 -0000
@@ -93,8 +93,10 @@
 DEF_SIMPLE_OPERATOR ("++", PREINCREMENT_EXPR, "pp", 1)
 DEF_SIMPLE_OPERATOR ("--", PREDECREMENT_EXPR, "mm", 1)
 DEF_SIMPLE_OPERATOR ("sizeof", SIZEOF_EXPR, "sz", 1)
-/* This is an extension.  */
+/* These are extensions.  */
 DEF_SIMPLE_OPERATOR ("alignof", ALIGNOF_EXPR, "v17alignof", 1)
+DEF_SIMPLE_OPERATOR ("__imag__", IMAGPART_EXPR, "v17__imag__",1)
+DEF_SIMPLE_OPERATOR ("__real__", REALPART_EXPR, "v17__real__",1)
 
 /* The cast operator.  */
 DEF_SIMPLE_OPERATOR ("", TYPE_EXPR, "cv", 1)

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html