GCC 3.3 release criteria
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Wed Feb 26 01:14:00 GMT 2003
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:55:53PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
> >I think the inline keyword should be treated exactly in the same terms as
> >the register keyword. That is, as a hint to the compiler. As time goes
> >by the inline keyword will become increasingly meaningless, since the
> >compiler will be able to do a better job. Forcing the compiler to respect
> >inline regardless of the consequences is a mistake.
>
> If you want to change the inline behaviour, you need first to deprecate
> with a warning the currently documented behaviour (in 3.2/3.3) and then
> change inline to a hint in 3.4.
Huh? No, "inline" was *always* only a suggestion. We've just
changed the heuristics involved in the choice.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list