PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.

[Neil Booth]

Neil Booth wrote:-

> Toon Moene wrote:-
> 
> > Now what I want to accomplish is to teach cc1 the same.  In fact, it 
> > would only be necessary to teach cc1 if -E is specified, but it probably 
> > won't hurt to simply prevent passing -ffixed-form and 
> > -ffixed-line-length-<blah> downwards to other option processors.
> > 
> > Hope this explanation helps,
> 
> Yeah, sorry, I didn't realise toplev.c wanted to jump in too.
> 
> What I mentioned in the other mail should work.  Whatever your original
> c-opts.c patch was  probably just needs one extra line:
> 
> 	case OPT_ffixed:
> +	result = -1;
> 	break;

But that'll stop -ffixed-<reg> working for C compilations.

We really want

	if (fortran)
	  result = -1;

but we don't have such a flag.  I've no good ideas I'm afraid.

Neil.