3.3 target date?

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Svein E. Seldal wrote:
> Hmm. I've committed a PR (PR/9387) for the gcc-3.3. And I see now that
> I've failed to mark the synopsis correctly, so it fails your search.

>From the PR it's not clear whether this is
 (a) a bug on the gcc-3.3 branch, or
 (b) a regression, that is, a bug on the gcc-3.3 branch that is new
     (in the sense that earlier versions of GCC got it right)

Only in the latter case should it be marked "high" and labled as a
regression.

Also, do you see the same on mainline?

(Depending on the answers to these two questions, please go ahead and
update the priority and synopsis of the PR.)

Thanks,
Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry"   pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/