3.3 target date?

[Svein E. Seldal]

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> That's interesting, because we still have 77 regressions in 3.3 listed
> in GNATS:

Hmm. I've committed a PR (PR/9387) for the gcc-3.3. And I see now that 
I've failed to mark the synopsis correctly, so it fails your search. 
(And I was uncertain about marking this as a high or a medium bug, so I 
marked it as medium.) -- Maybe thats why nobody have looked at it yet....

Maybe someone should evaluate the PR and at least give it a correct 
status and priority...

Thanks,
Svein Seldal