GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86 (patch?)

[J.D. Bronson]

At 10:27 AM 2/17/2003, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>  > On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, J.D. Bronson wrote:
>  > > I was able to build gcc 3.2.1 on solaris 9x86 w/o any trouble.
>  > > However, the same cannot be said for gcc 3.2.2:
>  >
>  > Yes, this is, unfortunately a regression introduced by a bug fix. :-(
>  >
>  > I believe it has been fixed now, and you might want to try and use CVS
>  > to access the most current version on the gcc-3.2 branch.
>
>I checked CVS with --target=i386-pc-solaris2.9 and it still fails on
>all three branches (trunk, 3.3 and 3.2).
>
>There was a lot of discussion but no patch was ever checked in. :-(
>
>
>  > (Perhaps this and the missing info files[1} alone would warrant a GCC
>  > 3.2.2a release?)
>  > Gerald
>
>My recollection of the "a" release convention is that it is for
>packaging problems only, no code changes.  The missing info files
>qualifies, but not the bugfix.  We'll need to release a 3.2.3.
>
>                 --Kaveh
>--
>Kaveh R. Ghazi                  ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu



This is what fixed it for me:

------------------- clip ------------------------
*** sysv4.h.orig Tue Jan 22 21:59:30 2002
--- sysv4.h Sun Feb 16 17:54:24 2003
***************
*** 27,32 ****
--- 27,35 ----
   /* The svr4 ABI for the i386 says that records and unions are returned
      in memory.  */

+ #undef DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN
+ #define DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN 0
+
   #undef RETURN_IN_MEMORY
   #define RETURN_IN_MEMORY(TYPE) \
     (TYPE_MODE (TYPE) == BLKmode \
------------------- clip ------------------------







-- 
J.D. Bronson
Aurora Health Care // Information Systems // Milwaukee, WI USA
Office: 414.978.8282 // Fax: 414.328.8282 // Pager: 414.603.8282