Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3

Kaoru Fukui k_fukui@highway.ne.jp
Wed Feb 12 17:29:00 GMT 2003


On 13 Feb, To: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu wrote:
> On 12 Feb, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>> I've heard some mention that 3.4 is faster in some cases than 3.3.
>> 
>> I know several speedup tweeks have been made since the branch was
>> created.  Not all of them have been backported.
>> 
>> If they're not too invasive, let's consider them for 3.3.  I'm willing
>> to help by regtesting patches if people can point out safe candidates.
>> Though I'd certainly appreciate assistance from others. :-)
>> 
>> 		Thanks,
>> 		--Kaveh
>> --
>> Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00377.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00560.htm
> There is Mike's info.
> 
> 
> I tried popcontext-fsf-2.diffs which is speedy, see below 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00380.html
> gcc-3.3 doesn't pch, so it needs to adjust.

Sorry, it was that gcc-3.3 doesn't have pch
K



More information about the Gcc mailing list