[tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID?

[Jan Hubicka]

> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:09:07AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > According to the current GIMPLE grammar this is invalid.  It seems to me
> > that these should be accepted as gimple ID, is that right?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Really we should be using magic decls, but that means moving quite
> a lot of except.c into tree-except.c; something I'm not prepared to
> do right away.

OK, thanks.
I've bundled this into the verify_gimple_grammar patch already, so
everything should be fine.

Honza
> 
> 
> r~