[tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID?

[Richard Henderson]

On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:09:07AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> According to the current GIMPLE grammar this is invalid.  It seems to me
> that these should be accepted as gimple ID, is that right?

Yes.

Really we should be using magic decls, but that means moving quite
a lot of except.c into tree-except.c; something I'm not prepared to
do right away.


r~