GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)

Marc Espie espie@nerim.net
Tue Dec 16 20:43:00 GMT 2003


On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:06:49AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> espie@quatramaran.ens.fr (Marc Espie) writes:
> 
> > In article <200312161732.hBGHWGNG019615@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> you write:
> >>Do we still need -fwritable-strings?  We have a 3.4 regression with
> >>that option, and I would prefer just to remove the option, since we're
> >>moving away from supporting traditional C anyhow.
> >
> > There is still some code out there that requires -fwritable-strings.
> >
> > One specific program is rogue.
> 
> Could you live with Richard Earnshaw's suggestion that it be
> deprecated in 3.4, removed in 3.5, and the bug Mark is talking about
> doesn't get fixed?

Do you have time to fix rogue's code ?



More information about the Gcc mailing list