GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
Zack Weinberg
zack@codesourcery.com
Tue Dec 16 19:17:00 GMT 2003
espie@quatramaran.ens.fr (Marc Espie) writes:
> In article <200312161732.hBGHWGNG019615@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> you write:
>>Do we still need -fwritable-strings? We have a 3.4 regression with
>>that option, and I would prefer just to remove the option, since we're
>>moving away from supporting traditional C anyhow.
>
> There is still some code out there that requires -fwritable-strings.
>
> One specific program is rogue.
Could you live with Richard Earnshaw's suggestion that it be
deprecated in 3.4, removed in 3.5, and the bug Mark is talking about
doesn't get fixed?
zw
More information about the Gcc
mailing list