Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119

[Robert Moss]

Okay, thanks. Just so long as I know!

Rob

Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Robert Moss <robert.moss@jesus.ox.ac.uk> writes:
> 
> 
>>Andreas, can you confirm that this is in fact the problem, and that
>>it's nothing to do with the (possibly slightly ridiculous) situation
>>in glibc in which the source uses asm behind gcc's back in relation to
>>weak functions?
>>
>>Rob
> 
> 
> Let's wait for a GCC patch - but looking at the assembly it really
> seems to be a issue with broken hidden support.
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 
> 
>>Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>
>>>It seems that visibilty handling is completly broken, see
>>>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13134.  Without this bug
>>>fixed, GCC cannot compile glibc correctly.
>>>Andreas
>>
> 
> Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 264 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20031202/fa0168ae/attachment.sig>