Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119

[Andreas Jaeger]

Robert Moss <robert.moss@jesus.ox.ac.uk> writes:

> Andreas, can you confirm that this is in fact the problem, and that
> it's nothing to do with the (possibly slightly ridiculous) situation
> in glibc in which the source uses asm behind gcc's back in relation to
> weak functions?
>
> Rob

Let's wait for a GCC patch - but looking at the assembly it really
seems to be a issue with broken hidden support.

Andreas


> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> It seems that visibilty handling is completly broken, see
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13134.  Without this bug
>> fixed, GCC cannot compile glibc correctly.
>> Andreas
>

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20031202/7ff91f8b/attachment.sig>