ColdFire/uClinux status update

[Bernardo Innocenti]

Hello,

All approved patches are already in CVS:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00579.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00633.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00634.html


These are still pending approval:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00752.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00549.html


I've also submitted this new patch:

 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg01222.html


This was to be redone using the ctx patterns:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00814.html


This one is somewhat controversial, but needed for ColdFire
targets until a better fix is found:

  http://www.develer.com/uclinux/uclinux-elf-tools/gcc-3.4-coldfire-reload.patch


Question: Is it ok to convert the m68k back-end to use ANSI
function argument declarations?

And what about ANSI preprocessor features such as defined()
and #elif?

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/

Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html