Converting to ISO C89

[Kaveh R. Ghazi]

 > Andrew Haley writes:
 >  > Mark Mitchell writes:
 >  >  > Good point.
 >  >  > 
 >  >  > Given that, I'd prefer not to see ISO C89 patches making their way into the
 >  >  > 3.3 branch.  That seems like more disruption than we need at this point.
 >  > 
 >  > Too late.  I've done it now, with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01532.html.
 >  > 
 >  > We can convert that patch to K&R if needs be.  It'll only take ten minutes to do that.
 > 
 > Should I convert this patch to K%R?
 > Andrew.

No.  Stuff in the language subdirs doesn't need to conform to K&R
style, regardless of the branch.  We don't pass -Wtraditional to the
java dir, for example.  If you're not getting a -Wtraditional warning,
don't worry about it.

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu