Converting to ISO C89

[Andrew Haley]

Andrew Haley writes:
 > Mark Mitchell writes:
 >  > Good point.
 >  > 
 >  > Given that, I'd prefer not to see ISO C89 patches making their way into the
 >  > 3.3 branch.  That seems like more disruption than we need at this point.
 > 
 > Too late.  I've done it now, with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01532.html.
 > 
 > We can convert that patch to K&R if needs be.  It'll only take ten minutes to do that.

Should I convert this patch to K%R?

Andrew.