libstdc++.so.x issue
Phil Edwards
phil@jaj.com
Tue Nov 19 19:49:00 GMT 2002
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:30:16PM -0500, Shen Wu wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thank you very much for you information. It clarifies the number of my
> doubts in respect of the gcc compatibility. As you pointed out we do need
> to rebuild our SDK for each of new GCC if it changes ABI i.e. with new
> libstdc++.so.x.
Or do what many vendors do and simply don't use a newer version of GCC.
> I have not seen the Linux venders starting put all the
> versions of libstdc++.so.x in the Linux distributions yet. For instance
> in Redhat 8.0, we only have libstdc++.so.5 and do not have previous versions.
The different versions are usually in different packages.
--
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
- Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002
More information about the Gcc
mailing list