Code size regressions, mainline+branch

[Daniel Berlin]

On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> > 	I assume that you are referring to x86 executable size.  Can you
> > narrow the size regression any further?  Was binutils updated?
> 
> Andreas didn't made any changes on setup of machine and the cfg-branch merger
> provoked same behaviour on the branch as well, so it is not configuration
> change.  Still I am feeling puzzled by what happends, hope to find time to
> debug it sometime later this week.
> 
> Note that the size is non-stripped, so possibly only debug info got
> bloated but I didn't find anything that may be responsible for that in
> the diffs as well.

Just a note, I just committed the dwarf2 location list stuff, but that was 
a few minutes ago, *after* the regressions started showing up.
So don't get confused and blame it.
:)