question about LAPACK (integration test for 3.1 release criteria)

[Billinghurst, David (CRTS)]

The results are similar to my results for i686-pc-cygwin, which I consider
to be OK.  See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-02/msg00456.html and the 
links in it. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Janis Johnson [mailto:janis187@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, 23 March 2002 5:04 
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: question about LAPACK (integration test for 3.1 release
criteria)


I ran LAPACK, from the list of integration tests from the gcc-3.1
criteria.html, on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu with GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.0.4.
They had the same results:

elm3a83% cd LAPACK/TESTING
elm3a83% fgrep -i fail *.out
cgd.out: CGV drivers:     59 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
csep.out: CST:    2 out of  4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ded.out: DES:    2 out of  3264 tests failed to pass the threshold
ded.out: DSX:    2 out of  3494 tests failed to pass the threshold
dgd.out: DXV drivers:    200 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
dsep.out: DST drivers:      1 out of  14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
sgd.out: SXV drivers:     37 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST:    2 out of  4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST drivers:      1 out of  14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
zgd.out: ZGV drivers:     63 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
zgd.out: ZXV drivers:     24 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold

I ran the timing tests and have the output files for 3.1 and 3.0.4.  Is
there an easy way to compare times for the two compilers?

Janis