question about LAPACK (integration test for 3.1 release criteria)

Janis Johnson janis187@us.ibm.com
Fri Mar 22 11:11:00 GMT 2002


I ran LAPACK, from the list of integration tests from the gcc-3.1
criteria.html, on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu with GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.0.4.
They had the same results:

elm3a83% cd LAPACK/TESTING
elm3a83% fgrep -i fail *.out
cgd.out: CGV drivers:     59 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
csep.out: CST:    2 out of  4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ded.out: DES:    2 out of  3264 tests failed to pass the threshold
ded.out: DSX:    2 out of  3494 tests failed to pass the threshold
dgd.out: DXV drivers:    200 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
dsep.out: DST drivers:      1 out of  14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
sgd.out: SXV drivers:     37 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST:    2 out of  4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST drivers:      1 out of  14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
zgd.out: ZGV drivers:     63 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
zgd.out: ZXV drivers:     24 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold

I ran the timing tests and have the output files for 3.1 and 3.0.4.  Is
there an easy way to compare times for the two compilers?

Janis



More information about the Gcc mailing list