integrated -save-temps and the death of specs

[Neil Booth]

Stan Shebs wrote:-

> > i agree that we have to provide a mechanism for user configurability,
> > but not at the expense of unreadability.  who can argue that the spec
> > file at the end of this message is readable, easy to update, and
> > debuggable? (that's just a random one picked).
> 
> I must be an old fogey then - the spec string doesn't seem any
> worse than the C code. :-)

Just brainwashed 8-)

Neil.