integrated -save-temps and the death of specs

[Aldy Hernandez]

>> i agree that we have to provide a mechanism for user configurability,
>> but not at the expense of unreadability.  who can argue that the spec
>> file at the end of this message is readable, easy to update, and
>> debuggable? (that's just a random one picked).
>
> I must be an old fogey then - the spec string doesn't seem any
> worse than the C code. :-)

i should pull out some code from a yet to be contributed mips port
that will make you cry.

how about specs that have the equivalent of:

	foo && (!bar && hot || geez || x) && (f || z)



>
> Stan
>
>
--
Aldy Hernandez                                E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com
Professional Gypsy Lost in Australia
Red Hat, Inc.