fixincludes FUBAR for upgrade

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Bruce Korb wrote:

> > Did the gcc maintainers not forsee that users must update the OS
> > sometimes?  What to do?
>
> Severely castigate the perveyors of non-ANSI compliant system headers?
> But, "feel better" flippant answers aside, it seems we do have a problem.
> We'll have to find a proper fix, but if you can build a "fixincl"
> binary on your old 2.6 box, it ought to run on 2.9, too.  Oh, the

Once a 2.6 box is upgraded to 2.9, it is not 2.6 any more.  No upgrade
path has been provided for gcc.

All of a sudden I am no longer a software developer anymore.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen