GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion

[Joseph S. Myers]

On 13 Jun 2002, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> I know GCC/gcc insists on saying ISO C89, but that is incorrect and
> I'll submit a patch to correct that anachronism.

So, you disagree with Phil's reasoning in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-08/msg00132.html
(the only response I got about choice of name in diagnostics that gave a
preference between the two)?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk