GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> writes:

[...]

| "ISO C89" (or whatever the correct standardese term is).

There is no ISO C89; there an ISO C90 :-)

I know GCC/gcc insists on saying ISO C89, but that is incorrect and
I'll submit a patch to correct that anachronism.

-- Gaby