Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90

[Stan Shebs]

law@redhat.com wrote:
> 
> In message <3CFF9A26.8E139A96@apple.com>, Stan Shebs writes:
>  > Now I'm completely confused.  Your first sentence says you managed to
>  > build (GCC presumably) with bundled compiler + extended ansi behavior,
> No, I was strictly referring to the unbundled compiler.  Never in that message
> did I say *ANYTHING* about the bundled compiler.
> 
> It would help a lot if you took the time to read the message carefully.

Sorry, I reread your message a number of times, but this still
looks like you making a reference to the bundled compiler, starred
and uppercased to make sure that dumb ol' Stan saw it:

> [...]  I've managed to build with the *BUNDLED*
> compiler using a variety of flags to get extended ansi behavior.

Sorry to be both dense and persistent about all this, but the whole
K&R requirement for GCC seems to rest on what HP's various compilers
are and are not capable of doing.  Since I'm regularly in the position
of explaining the K&R requirement both to astonished Apple management
and incredulous new hires, it's helpful to have the precise facts of
the situation.

Stan