Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:21:42AM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote:
> law@redhat.com wrote:
> > NO.  Read "unbundled" in my message.  I've managed to build with the *BUNDLED*
> > compiler using a variety of flags to get extended ansi behavior.
> > 
> > The only success I've had with the bundled compiler has been on non-ANSI
> > code.
> 
> Now I'm completely confused.  Your first sentence says you managed to
> build (GCC presumably) with bundled compiler + extended ansi behavior,
> and your second sentence says that the bundled compiler only works on
> non-ANSI code, which sounds like it contradicts your first sentence.
> Do you mean that "extended ansi behavior" is required to compile GCC
> in its current state?
> 
> Stan
> 

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:49:58AM -0600, law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <3CFF9A26.8E139A96@apple.com>, Stan Shebs writes:
>  > Now I'm completely confused.  Your first sentence says you managed to
>  > build (GCC presumably) with bundled compiler + extended ansi behavior,
> No, I was strictly referring to the unbundled compiler.  Never in that message
> did I say *ANYTHING* about the bundled compiler.
> 
> It would help a lot if you took the time to read the message carefully.

Sorry, Jeff; reread your own message.  You dropped an UN inside the
first pair of stars.  I assume you meant *UNBUNDLED* at least.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer