merging for 3.4 (was Re: [Patch] Qualify min(), max() ...)

[David Edelsohn]

>>>>> Gabriel Dos Reis writes:

Gaby> Since (a) depends on acceptance of GIMPLE and GENERIC, which are
Gaby> invasive and quite not yet mature, I would prefer (b) given the
Gaby> other invasive works already scheduled for 3.4.

	The lack of the Tree-SSA infrastructure in GCC 3.4 may discourage
developers from working on GCC 3.4 and encourage the further branching and
fragmentation of GCC.

David