DWARF2 verses DWARF3

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Mon Aug 19 10:39:00 GMT 2002


On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:29:52PM +0100, Keith.Walker wrote:
> Or is the intention to move towards the output being DWARF3 (and no means
> of restricting it to being DWARF2).

That's my intent at the moment.  It's no worse than the other
GNU-specific extensions we wind up using, and typically better
documented.



r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list