Should we make "implicit declaration of function" a mandatory warning?

[Zack Weinberg]

On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 07:04:33PM +1100, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> On 14-Jan-2001, Zack Weinberg <zackw@stanford.edu> wrote:
> > What do people think
> > of promoting the "implicit declaration of function" warning to
> > mandatory?
> 
> Mandatory sounds a bit harsh, but I'd be quite happy if this
> warning was enabled by default.

That's all I meant by 'mandatory'; what did you think I meant?

zw