Should we make "implicit declaration of function" a mandatory warning?

[Fergus Henderson]

On 14-Jan-2001, Zack Weinberg <zackw@stanford.edu> wrote:
> What do people think
> of promoting the "implicit declaration of function" warning to
> mandatory?

Mandatory sounds a bit harsh, but I'd be quite happy if this
warning was enabled by default.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
                                    |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: < http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh >  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.