Is this a gcc bug?

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jan 11, 2001, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:

>> How about something like:
>> warning: 'x' may have unexpected value because of side-effects
>> or
>> warning: side-effects make value of 'x' undefined
>> or
>> warning: undefined order of side-effects on 'x'
>> One might replace "side-effects" by "updates" or "changes to".

> How about, multiple side-effects on 'x' between sequence points?

I think it's too technical.  How about `evaluation order of `x' is
undefined'?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me