Is this a gcc bug?

Richard Earnshaw rearnsha@arm.com
Thu Jan 11 09:03:00 GMT 2001


> How about something like:
>         warning: 'x' may have unexpected value because of side-effects
> or
>         warning: side-effects make value of 'x' undefined
> or
>         warning: undefined order of side-effects on 'x'
> One might replace "side-effects" by "updates" or "changes to".

How about, multiple side-effects on 'x' between sequence points?



More information about the Gcc mailing list