bugs fixed in 3.0.3 -- second draft

[Joe Buck]

> On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Joe Buck wrote:
> 
> > Yes, it should suffice to keep the bug database and the "fixed bugs" list
> > consistent: if you mark a bug closed because it is a bug that has been
> > fixed, it shouldn't be hard to note the fact on the list.  So the only
> > time someone would need to change the list is when:
> 
> A common case is that of closing a PR because the reported bug is no 
> longer present in CVS mainline - without any investigation of whether it 
> was present in 3.0.x (which might, for example, require a 
> --enable-checking version of 3.0.x to be installed, for some ICE bugs).

C'est la vie. In such a case it would be entered into the "fixed in 3.1"
list, and it wouldn't get in the "fixed in 3.0.x" list unless someone
checked later.