bugs fixed in 3.0.3 -- second draft

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Joe Buck wrote:

> Yes, it should suffice to keep the bug database and the "fixed bugs" list
> consistent: if you mark a bug closed because it is a bug that has been
> fixed, it shouldn't be hard to note the fact on the list.  So the only
> time someone would need to change the list is when:

A common case is that of closing a PR because the reported bug is no 
longer present in CVS mainline - without any investigation of whether it 
was present in 3.0.x (which might, for example, require a 
--enable-checking version of 3.0.x to be installed, for some ICE bugs).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk