rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS

[Aldy Hernandez]

On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 19:55, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Aldy Hernandez writes:
> 
> Aldy> is there a reason why NON_SPECIAL_REGS is not the exact bit opposite of
> Aldy> SPECIAL_REGS?
> 
> Aldy> { 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0x00000008, 0x00000000 }, /* NON_SPECIAL_REGS */ \
> 
> Aldy> { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000007, 0x00000000 }, /* SPECIAL_REGS */     \
> 
> 	Because the name is not accurate?  It really is the union of
> GENERAL_REGS and FLOAT_REGS.

ahh, that explains my float failures when i "fix" non_special_regs.

thx
> 
> David
-- 
Aldy Hernandez			E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com
Professional Gypsy
Red Hat, Inc.