[Fwd: 3 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on2001-08-09T11:45:02Z.]

[Geoff Keating]

> From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Date: 09 Aug 2001 17:15:17 +0300
> 
> is this necessary? --to know that nothing got fixed?  seems kinda
> pointless.

This is a FAQ.  I will add the answer to the regression tester's page.

> -----Forwarded Message-----
> From: GCC regression checker <regress@cygnus.com>
> To: gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: 3 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on
> 2001-08-09T11:45:02Z.
> 
> 
> With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> used to pass.  There are 0 new failures, and 3
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
> 
> The old failures, which were not fixed or introduced by your patch, are:
> powerpc-eabisim g++.sum g++.dg/opt/alias1.C
> powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.dg/special/gcsec-1.c
> native gcc.sum gcc.dg/special/gcsec-1.c
> 
> For more information, see < http://www.cygnus.com/~geoffk/gcc-regression/ >.
> 
> --BOUNDARY
> -- 
> Geoffrey Keating <regress@maat.cygnus.com> 
> (via an automated GCC regression-testing script.)
> 


-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>