[Fwd: 3 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on2001-08-09T11:45:02Z.]

[Aldy Hernandez]

is this necessary? --to know that nothing got fixed?  seems kinda
pointless.

aldy

-----Forwarded Message-----
From: GCC regression checker <regress@cygnus.com>
To: gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: 3 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on
2001-08-09T11:45:02Z.


With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
used to pass.  There are 0 new failures, and 3
failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
have been fixed.

The old failures, which were not fixed or introduced by your patch, are:
powerpc-eabisim g++.sum g++.dg/opt/alias1.C
powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.dg/special/gcsec-1.c
native gcc.sum gcc.dg/special/gcsec-1.c

For more information, see < http://www.cygnus.com/~geoffk/gcc-regression/ >.

--BOUNDARY
-- 
Geoffrey Keating <regress@maat.cygnus.com> 
(via an automated GCC regression-testing script.)