Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64

[Bill Nottingham]

(restating some stuff from private mail)

Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware wrote:
>Umm, actually, are you sure you applied the patch?
>
>The abort location should be moved down a few lines, yet it's claiming
>an ICE at the exact same location it did before (there is no other
>abort() in that routine).

Yup, I did apply the patch; I can confirm with this patch in head
I can build libstdc++-v3 OK; but it still fails for me on the
3.0 branch in the same place.

Bill