Bootstrap failure of gcc-ss-20010409 in ia64

[Daniel Berlin]

Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> writes:

> Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com> said:
> >Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> >Please note the patch might not work in all cases, but it should still
> >get you past the point you are at now, and if it does, i'll submit a
> >correct patch.
> 
> It doesn't here, in brief testing - it still dies at the same place:
> 


> Do you need more info?

Yes, I need to know what the locals and args look like in gcc when it crashes.


Using alan's test file on the same bug report, i am unable to
reproduce at all.

Umm, actually, are you sure you applied the patch?

The abort location should be moved down a few lines, yet it's claiming
an ICE at the exact same location it did before (there is no other
abort() in that routine).


> 
> Bill

-- 
I installed a skylight in my apartment....  The people who live
above me are furious!