Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
Akim Demaille
akim@epita.fr
Mon Sep 25 02:04:00 GMT 2000
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Josling <tej@melbpc.org.au> writes:
Tim> Before adding new standards I think it would be better to have
Tim> the existing standards followed more closely eg comments and
Tim> meaningful variable names. At present these are the major hurdles
Tim> in front of anyone wanting to help with GCC. In particular the
Tim> configure/make files are a major 'swamp of no return'.
Mark> I don't think it's either/or. I would love to see the Makefiles
Mark> improved. I actually looked at this stuff a few months back,
Mark> and couldn't quite do what I wanted to do -- which was to move a
Mark> lot more stuff to configure time, instead of Makefile evaluation
Mark> time.
Would you say much of the problems are coming from the fact that the
standards support things like
./configure
make prefix=/foo
? I'm personally strongly in favor of deprecating this practice, and
support only
./configure --prefix
make
Your last sentence seems to indicate you met that frontier.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list