gcc 2.98 release better approach?

[Toon Moene]

Mike Stump wrote:

> > Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:47:55 +0200
> > From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>

> > We cannot stop Red Hat from issuing a half-way compiler

> We should not take pot shots at other peoples compilers

This might be caused by my less-than-average command of the English
language, but I meant by "half-way" compiler the result of taking a
snapshot half way through the process of producing a GCC that would have
to break C++ binary compatibility only *once*.

If this phrase has a less-than-complimentary connotation in English, I
duefully apologize - I did not want to take a "pot shot" here.

Sorry,

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)