My proposal for the libgcc runtime ABI (ia64 gcc/glibc is broken.)

Mike Stump mrs@windriver.com
Tue Jul 11 11:51:00 GMT 2000


> From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
> Date: 11 Jul 2000 00:51:24 -0700

> This is my I'm currently favouring a standaline package.  But there
> might be situation where a new libc might require a new version of
> the libgcc.so

Isn't this as desirable as a new version of emacs requiring a new
version of libgcc.so?


More information about the Gcc mailing list