gcc snapshots -vs- java libraries

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

"Tim Prince" <tprince@computer.org> writes:

| >   In message < 3A37FF5E.8041334D@albatross.co.nz >you write:
| >   > It looks like the java libs are going into the gcc-core archive on
| the
| >   > snapshots page. Shouldn't zlib, fastjar, boehm-gc, libffi, and
| libjava
| >   > be put into the gcc-java archive instead?
| > Yes.  The snapshot script needs some updates to account for the
| > integration of libgcj stuff.
| > jeff
| 
| Is the build of libgcj intended to be mandatory regardless of whether
| java is built?  Likewise, for libstdc++-v3 without c++?  I'd prefer to
| be able to build languages one at a time and test just the ones which
| are building successfully.

Agreed. One should not get Java libs built when one didn't configure
for Java.  Likewise for C++.

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com