gcc snapshots -vs- java libraries

[Tim Prince]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey A Law" <law@redhat.com>
To: "Bryce McKinlay" <bryce@albatross.co.nz>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: gcc snapshots -vs- java libraries


>
>   In message < 3A37FF5E.8041334D@albatross.co.nz >you write:
>   > It looks like the java libs are going into the gcc-core archive on
the
>   > snapshots page. Shouldn't zlib, fastjar, boehm-gc, libffi, and
libjava
>   > be put into the gcc-java archive instead?
> Yes.  The snapshot script needs some updates to account for the
> integration of libgcj stuff.
> jeff

Is the build of libgcj intended to be mandatory regardless of whether
java is built?  Likewise, for libstdc++-v3 without c++?  I'd prefer to
be able to build languages one at a time and test just the ones which
are building successfully.