GCC 3.0 Release Criteria

[Joe Buck]

[ Chill front end ]

Trevor Jenkins
> I'll play devil's advocate here; or should that be hell's-frozen-over
> advocate? I believe there to be a very good reason for keeping the Chill
> front-end maintained as part of gcc 3 and later. It provides a
> reference/tutorial case of integrating a new language into the gcc
> architecture.

If we're going to maintain it, we need a maintainer; the original author
has gone on to other work, and almost none of the developers knows Chill.